Overleg gebruker:Bdijkstra

Kategorie:Dialektmuziek --> Kategorie:Streektaolmuziek

Moi B. Diekstra, bij de naamswieziging Kategorie:Dialektmuziek --> Kategorie:Streektaolmuziek bint de artikels niet automatisch mitekomen. Is der een meniere umme die mit iene bewarking onder de neie kattegoriename te scharen? As 't haandmaotig mut, za'k det binnenkört doen. Dank! Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 11:53, 2 nov 2020 (CET)

t Ken nait med ien bewarking, moar wol med ien botupdracht. Uutevoerd med bitbotje. --bdijkstra (overleg) 12:09, 2 nov 2020 (CET)

Tige tank! Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 12:40, 2 nov 2020 (CET)

Automatisk invüllen van gemeynde-/provinsy-/landsgegeavens

Gode dag, Bdijkstra! Meskeen dat jy weaten ho et sit. Up de NL wiki stån inwunner- en uppervlakdegegeavens automatisk inevüld by gemeynden/provinsys of landen. Volgens myn wörden dee gegeavens upehaald üüt Wikidata. Eynig idee ho wy dat hyr ansetten en implementeren künnen? Dat solde en bült wark skealen üm alles by te warken (wat håst neet te doon is mid sou'n klein klubjen, wårdöär summige gemeynden bv. gegeavens hebben van 2014). As jy meyr weaten, ik holde myn anbevöälen. Servien (overleg) 14:37, 9 mei 2021 (CEST)

Et sol u wyder weinig helpen denk ik, maar dit is de kode dee by de NL Zwolle Wikipedia steet by inwoners: {{Statistiek gemeente Nederland inwoners|TXT=year}} {{Statistiek gemeente Nederland inwoners|0193}} Grwen (overleg) 19:49, 9 mei 2021 (CEST)

Sommige uppervlakdegegeavens wörden nog handmatig invuld, dat ännert nait zoveul. Vuur zover as t automatisk goat, gait t sums met n tabel van n statistiske dienst dee ummezet wurdt in n mal, en sums met n mal+module dee gegeavens van Wikidata uphoalt. Der syn verschillende mallen um gegeavens uut Wikidata te hoalen. t Zol seaker n bult wark skealen, moar t kost wel eerst n bult wark um t op te zetten. --bdijkstra (overleg) 21:18, 9 mei 2021 (CEST)

Dat is spytig. En antal andere kleine wikis skynen et in gebrüük te hebben, geen idee of dat up deselvde wyse is as jy beskryven. Ik had ehoaped dat et makkeliker üüt Wikidata te halen was, mär bedanked vöär et meaddenken! Servien (overleg) 23:11, 12 mei 2021 (CEST)

Deurverwiesziede

Ik bin derveur um 'deurverwiesziede' (zoas in Zwolle (deurverwiesziede)) of, feilijk mooier nog, 'deurverwiesblad' te gebruken, in plaatse van 't arg formeel Nederlaandse '-pagina'. Wat ducht oe? Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 01:35, 11 okt 2021 (CEST)

Et ging my erum dat t nait "deurverwiezing" sol syn, dat is verwarrend. De offisjele term is zo te zeen "döärverwyssyde". bdijkstra (overleg) 01:50, 11 okt 2021 (CEST)

Dan hol ik det an. Der bint dan nog hiel wat "deurverwiespagina's" te hernumen; as det niet automatiseerd kan, muw det mar staorigiesan anpakken. Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 02:06, 11 okt 2021 (CEST)

Poem style

Dankewal veur de Poem-style-wikitext op Harm Koops. Ik had der nog naor ezöcht umdej det lest ok ies anebracht hadden, mar kun 't zo rap niet weerummevienden. Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 22:18, 26 okt 2021 (CEST)

Gerne gedoan. Op mien gebrukerssyde vi-je n spiekbriefie. --bdijkstra (overleg) 15:55, 27 okt 2021 (CEST)

Translation request

Hello.

Can you translate and upload the articles nl:Azerbeidzjanen and nl:Azerbeidzjaans in Lower Saxon Wikipedia? They certainly do not need to be long and detailed.

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (overleg) 12:59, 9 nov 2021 (CET)

No, I don't have enough affinity with the subjects to overcome my lack of proficiency. bdijkstra (overleg) 13:04, 9 nov 2021 (CET)

I understand. Thank you for the reply. Multituberculata (overleg) 11:31, 11 nov 2021 (CET)

Kategorie:Nedersaksiese leu

Moi BDijkstra, ie hebt de Kategorie:Nedersaksiese leu vurtehaald bij Everhard Jans en daor is wat veur te zeggen, aj de kattegorieën hiërarchisch bekiekt en dervan uutgiet det 't miest specifieke 't belangriekste is. In dit geval: iene die in de Kategorie:Tukker vaalt, is per definitie ok een Nedersaks.

An de aandere kaante: waor hew de Kategorie:Nedersaksiese leu dan veur? Ik had hum toch mar bij Everhard Jans ezet, umdet Jans as regionalist niet mar zo iene was die toevallig uut Twente kwaamp, mar iene die hielemaole veur de streekcultuur gunk, en hum dus expliciet inzette veur 't Nedersaksisch eigen (waoronder de taal). Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 12:33, 30 nov 2021 (CET)

Mar kategoryen sínd ôk hiërarchisk, t syn gien tags! So as t noe is, is de Kategorie:Nedersaksiese leu veur Nedersaksiese leu dee gien Nedersaksies model óf gien Tukker sind. bdijkstra (overleg) 12:48, 30 nov 2021 (CET)

Op de Engelse Wikipedia is der een neiging naor 'beter te veule as te weinig kattegorieën'. Ik perbere altied te bedèenken as een kattegorie zinnig en to the point is en wat unieks toevoegt. Stel, ie kiekt naor wie der in Kategorie:Nedersaksiese leu vaalt, umdej weten wilt wie of hum inezet hef veur Nedersaksische taal en cultuur, of um nog een aandere reden uutgetiekend Nedersaksisch enuumd kan wörden. Mar ie zuukt niet uutslutend Tukkers. Dan zoj zoas 't now is Everhard Jans dus niet vienden. Daorumme de'k die kattegorie hier weerde vien toevoegen. Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 14:07, 30 nov 2021 (CET)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

19:18, 4 jan 2022 (CET)

Mal:Spraoke

Gode dag, Bdijkstra! Ik weat neet in hoveare jy verstand hebben van mallen (sjablonen), mär ik see dat in Mal:Spraoke de afbealding neet meyr te seen is (see bv. artikel Korsikaans). Weat jy ho wy afbealdingen weader sichtbår krygen? As jy et weaten dan höyr ik et graege. Servien (overleg) 21:03, 2 mrt 2022 (CET)

Bleek n probleem met alle infoboxen, veröörzåkt döör dizze wysiging. bdijkstra (overleg) 21:11, 2 mrt 2022 (CET)

Aah, kyk an. Dat do jy rap! Dankenswaerd, kearl! Servien (overleg) 21:17, 2 mrt 2022 (CET)

Hernömen Hollaand (gewest) nå Hollaand

Gode dag, Bdijkstra! Kan jy Hollaand (gewest) hernömen nå Hollaand? Alvast bedanked! Alloykcks (overleg) 13:22, 19 okt 2022 (CEST)

Uut-evoerd. bdijkstra (overleg) 13:52, 19 okt 2022 (CEST)

Mår joe måk t nu wol moelyker um links te controleren. Der bennen al zoveul foute links up dizze wiki. bdijkstra (overleg) 17:57, 19 okt 2022 (CEST)

ï

Ha Bert, danke vöär et medkyken. In de NSS hebbet wy ginnen ï. Mär ik begrype dat et verwarrend is med de [ei] dee WAL in de NSS sit. Ik sal es oaverleggen wat wy in dit geval doot. Danke dat y dat under den andacht brengt. Woolters (overleg) 11:14, 10 jan 2023 (CET)

t Neaderlands het ok gien ï (as letter), t is gewoon n trema. Moar ik begriep dat t verwarring gev met e umlaut. Op Nysassiske Skryvwyse zee ik inderdaod niks stoan over klinkerbotsings. bdijkstra (overleg) 12:27, 10 jan 2023 (CET)

De NSS hevt ouk gin <ië>, ümdat de <ie> al vöär de [iə] steyt. Dat seest byvöärbeald in de artikels Dinosauriers, Mauritanie en kaapverdie. Wy wachtet et antwoord noch eaven af. Woolters (overleg) 13:47, 10 jan 2023 (CET)

Request

@Bdijkstra Hi, I am a car fanatic and I have a request. Please can you create these car manufacturer pages on Dutch Low Saxon Wiki:

• Borgward (since this company is from Bremen, a city where both Dutch Low Saxon and Low German is spoken
• DAF Trucks (since this company is from Netherlands and Dutch Low Saxon is spoken in this country
• Donkervoort
• Spyker Cars

I don't understand the language that's why I asked a person who is native to this language. I would thank you so much if you will create them. Thanks NAIRDASH (overleg) 15:40, 11 mei 2023 (CEST)

Hi, I'm not native to this language and I'm not enough of a car enthusiast to write these articles. bdijkstra (overleg) 15:54, 11 mei 2023 (CEST)

@Bdijkstra Who I can ask on this Wiki for this request? NAIRDASH (overleg) 18:23, 11 mei 2023 (CEST)

You've already asked the most active users of the past months. bdijkstra (overleg) 19:55, 11 mei 2023 (CEST)

Translation request

Hi. Could you please translate this to Nedersaksies?

Lingua Franca Nova (“Elefen”) is a language designed to be particularly simple, consistent, and easy to learn for international communications. It has a number of positive qualities:

• 1. It has a limited number of phonemes. It sounds similar to Italian or Spanish.
  
• 2. It is phonetically spelled. No child should have to spend years learning irregularities.
  
• 3. It has a completely regular grammar, similar to the world’s creoles.
  
• 4. It has a limited and completely regular set of productive affixes for routine word derivation.
  
• 5. It has well-defined rules for word order, in keeping with many major languages.
  
• 6. Its vocabulary is strongly rooted in modern Romance languages. These languages are themselves widespread and influential, plus they have contributed the major part of English vocabulary
  
• 7. It is designed to be naturally accepting of Latin and Greek technical neologisms, the de facto “world standard”.
  
• 8. It is designed to seem relatively “natural” to those who are familiar with Romance languages, without being any more difficult for others to learn.
  
• We hope you like Elefen!

Thanks for your help. --Caro de Segeda (overleg) 13:10, 30 mei 2023 (CEST)

Are there any independent and reputable sources that give non-trivial attention to this subject? bdijkstra (overleg) 13:39, 30 mei 2023 (CEST)

I understand that you prefer not to do it. Thanks anyways for your time. Caro de Segeda (overleg) 14:07, 30 mei 2023 (CEST)

Hi, my two cents as a contributor to the Dutch Low Saxon Wikipedia. There are things to be said for and against requesting translations, but the Dutch Low Saxon Wikipedia is literally being kept afloat by a handful of volunteers. This generally means that only the bare minimum gets seen to: technical maintenance, countering vandalism, and contributions on topics that the writers are personally interested in. I only wish we had more contributors, so we could also take care of such things as translation requests. Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 15:20, 30 mei 2023 (CEST)

I don't speak the language but if you need help with things like adding templates or maybe creating articles about municipalities where the only things that change are names and numbers, please let me know. Caro de Segeda (overleg) 17:49, 30 mei 2023 (CEST)

Thanks. I myself am only occasionally active here because frankly I consider the Dutch Low Saxon Wikipedia to have been, for very many years now, mostly a failed project. There are not enough contributors to be able to speak of even a small community that can make sensible decisions and carry out relevant projects (such as keeping articles up to date). I say mostly, because at least we put a huge amount of Low Saxon information on the Internet that was not previously available. Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 10:23, 4 jun 2023 (CEST)

Chipping in as a more active member and to offer some balance to Ni'jluuseger's assertion that it is a failed project: we've already created some 9,000 articles with only a handful contributors. I wouldn't call that a failed project. I'd be very happy if you helped us raise the article count with templated articles. Things like municipalities around the world, rivers, or stars and the elements of the periodic table can be easily standardised. The more subjects we'll touch, the higher the chance we'll attract more contributors who want to expand on their favourite subjects. Woolters (overleg) 11:37, 4 jun 2023 (CEST)

Woolters, if you - as the most productive writer - were to stop contributing, we'd be lucky to add ten new articles in any given year. I know that all language versions of Wikipedia get written and coded by a minuscule number of persons compared to the number of speakers of a given language, but we (through no fault of our own) rely on two or three language or coding freaks who cannot keep the articles updated, ensure encylopaedic quality for a large number of articles (I especially mean those articles written at one time by occasional, inexperienced writers), or convey more than a sliver of the Low Saxon world.

Articles here are almost never collaborative, and the quality and accuracy of your typical article relies entirely on the abilities of and knowledge available to the lone writer. Attempts to recruit new collaborators are always met with silence. Our articles, with the possible exception of articles on Low-Saxon-specific subjects, probably remain unread, as Dutch people use the Dutch and English Wikipedias. I'd say us few freaks keep this thing going *despite* it having failed as a collaborative community encyclopaedia. Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 14:21, 5 jun 2023 (CEST)

Ensuring encyclopaedic quality will be easy if we use predefined templates, basically reducing the noble art of creating new articles to a fill-in-the-blanks exercise. Isn't there some sort of solution from Wikidata already? Side thought: if nobody reads them, well they won't tinker with them either then ;-).

You're right that the majority of the articles would severely underrepresent the richness of Low Saxon. But is that the purpose of Wikipedia? And isn't that the case for any given language on this platform? One solution would be to make the featured articles even more prominent. That means we may have to considerably expand, diversify and rearrange this rather short list. Woolters (overleg) 15:09, 5 jun 2023 (CEST)

"Ensuring encyclopaedic quality will be easy if we use predefined templates". Perhaps for articles that can be standardised to some degree, but I don't see that for other types of articles such as, oh, Sallaands mythology. Anyway, when it comes to articles with repeated content and structures, such as on Drèents writers, my method has forever been to copy an existing article, then replace what needs to be replaced. A template of sorts.

I'm not sure what you propose with reference to featured articles. Any given article should ideally be as good as can be; nobody cares if it's got a "featured" star or not, like on the English Wikipedia. It would just be more pointless work for us.

I've long toyed with the idea of writing a short history of the Low Saxon Wikipedia and explaining why, in my analysis, it's more proof that the now very advanced extinction process of Low Saxon will not be ruffled in the least by either the emergence of more positive views of regional language or the emergence of a Nedersaksisch identity. All of that is empty posturing with regard to the language itself. Ni'jluuseger (overleg) 00:33, 7 jun 2023 (CEST)

Translation request

Hello.

Can you create the article nl:Laacher See, which is the third most powerful volcano in Europe after Campi Flegrei and Santorini, in Lower Saxon Wikipedia?

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (overleg) 11:23, 24 jun 2023 (CEST)